Pure laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy (with video).

Only a few centers in the world perform pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. In this procedure, right lobe donation is mostly preferred in view of the higher graft volume usually needed for the recipient. In the area, laparoscopic surgery has had a minor development given the greater technical difficulty and risks for both donor and preservation of the graft. Nevertheless, last 3 years, the advances in major laparoscopic liver surgery suggest that pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy could be a feasible and safe procedure in appropriately selected donors, and mostly, when is performed by surgeons with significant experience in both laparoscopic liver surgery and liver transplantation with living donor liver grafts. This video shows the surgical technique of a pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy in a 30-year-old female volunteered for living donation to her brother.

Fully laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy, Puestow procedure (with video).

Chronic pancreatitis usually requires medical treatment and, in rare cases, surgical intervention. The most frequent cause of consultation is chronic pain that is difficult to manage, and therapeutic options such as endoscopy can resolve most problems without surgery. However, when these options fail, surgical management is necessary. The most common surgery is a lateral pancreatic bypass or Puestow surgery. We present the case of a 31-year-old patient with unspecific abdominal discomfort. Abdominal ultrasonography showed significant dilation of the pancreatic duct (18 mm). Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging showed an impacted stone in the head of the pancreas and pancreas divisum. Resolution with endoscopy was attempted, but the pancreatic duct could not be accessed due to impacted lithiasis. After discussion in a multidisciplinary committee, surgical treatment was recommended, and a fully laparoscopic Puestow surgery was performed.

Achievement of effective cardiopulmonary trauma surgical skills training throughout the incorporation of a low-cost and easy to implement pulsatile simulation model.

OBJECTIVES: . In the last decade, concern regarding the preparedness of general surgery graduates to effectively manage thoracic trauma cases has been raised. However, due to limited availability and elevated costs, access to cardiopulmonary trauma simulation models is limited. This article describes our experience implementing a low-cost blended ex vivo tissue-based simulation model using animal by-products that incorporates pump perfusion and ventilation. DESIGN: . Firstly, for validation purposes 8 junior residents, 8 recently graduated general surgeons, and 3 cardiothoracic surgery attendings from Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Clinical Hospital were recruited. Proficiency in performing a pulmonary tractotomy and a myocardial injury repair was assessed with global and specific rating scales. Secondly, to evaluate the effectiveness of the model as a learning tool, 16 general surgery residents from different programs across the country were recruited receiving intensive, personalized training on the models. Proficiency was measured before and after the training. RESULTS: . For the validation phase, significant differences among groups according to the previous level of expertise were shown, and therefore construct validity was established. The results of the second phase showed a significant overall improvement in participant's performance. CONCLUSION: . Effective training and assessment for advanced surgical skills in cardiothoracic trauma can be achieved using a low-cost pulsatile simulation model.

Role of tumour location and surgical extent on prognosis in T2 gallbladder cancer: an international multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: In gallbladder cancer, stage T2 is subdivided by tumour location into lesions on the peritoneal side (T2a) or hepatic side (T2b). For tumours on the peritoneal side (T2a), it has been suggested that liver resection may be omitted without compromising the prognosis. However, data to validate this argument are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of tumour location in T2 gallbladder cancer, and to clarify the adequate extent of surgical resection. METHODS: Clinical data from patients who underwent surgery for gallbladder cancer were collected from 14 hospitals in Korea, Japan, Chile and the USA. Survival and risk factor analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Data from 937 patients were available for evaluation. The overall 5-year disease-free survival rate was 70·6 per cent, 74·5 per cent for those with T2a and 65·5 per cent among those with T2b tumours (P = 0·028). Regarding liver resection, extended cholecystectomy was associated with a better 5-year disease-free survival rate than simple cholecystectomy (73·0 versus 61·5 per cent; P = 0·012). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was marginally better for extended than simple cholecystectomy in both T2a (76·5 versus 66·1 per cent; P = 0·094) and T2b (68·2 versus 56·2 per cent; P = 0·084) disease. Five-year disease-free survival rates were similar for extended cholecystectomies including liver wedge resection versus segment IVb/V segmentectomy (74·1 versus 71·5 per cent; P = 0·720). In multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for recurrence were presence of symptoms (hazard ratio (HR) 1·52; P = 0·002), R1 resection (HR 1·96; P = 0·004) and N1/N2 status (N1: HR 3·40, P < 0·001; N2: HR 9·56, P < 0·001). Among recurrences, 70·8 per cent were metastatic. CONCLUSION: Tumour location was not an independent prognostic factor in T2 gallbladder cancer. Extended cholecystectomy was marginally superior to simple cholecystectomy. A radical operation should include liver resection and adequate node dissection.

ANTECEDENTES: En el cáncer de vesícula biliar, la ubicación del tumor subdivide el estadio T2 en tumores con invasión del lado peritoneal y del lado del hígado (T2a y T2b). Para los tumores que invaden el lado peritoneal (T2a) se sugiere que se puede obviar la resección hepática sin que ello comprometa el pronóstico. Sin embargo, este argumento no ha sido validado. El estudio tuvo como objetivo investigar el valor pronóstico de la localización del tumor en el cáncer de vesícula biliar T2 y establecer la extensión adecuada de la resección quirúrgica. MÉTODOS: Se recogieron los datos clínicos de pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía por cáncer de vesícula biliar en 14 hospitales de Corea, Japón, Chile y Estados Unidos. Se realizaron análisis de la supervivencia y de los factores de riesgo. RESULTADOS: Se dispuso de datos de 937 pacientes para ser evaluados. La tasa de supervivencia global libre de enfermedad a los 5 años fue del 70,6%, y las de T2a y T2b del 74,5% y 65,5% (P = 0,028). Con respecto a la resección hepática, la colecistectomía extendida presentó una tasa mejor de supervivencia libre de enfermedad a los 5 años que la colecistectomía simple (73,0% versus 61,5%, P = 0,012). La tasa de supervivencia libre de enfermedad a los 5 años fue marginalmente mejor para la colecistectomía extendida que para la colecistectomía simple tanto en T2a (76,5% versus 66,1%, P = 0,094) como en T2b (68,2% versus 56,2%, P = 0,084). Las tasas de supervivencia libre de enfermedad a los 5 años no fueron diferentes entre la resección hepática en cuña y la segmentectomía S4b+S5 (74,1% versus 71,5%, P = 0,720). En el análisis multivariable, los factores de riesgo independientes para la recidiva fueron la presencia de síntomas (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR 1,52, P = 0,002), la resección R1 (HR 1,96, P = 0,004) y el estadio N1/N2 (N1 HR 3,40, P < 0,001; N2 HR 9,56, P < 0,001). El 70,8% de las recidivas eran metastásicas. CONCLUSIÓN: La localización del tumor no fue un factor pronóstico independiente en el cáncer de vesícula biliar T2. La colecistectomía extendida fue marginalmente superior que la colecistectomía simple. La cirugía radical debe incluir una resección hepática y una linfadenectomía adecuada.

Comparison of oncological outcomes after open and laparoscopic re-resection of incidental gallbladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: The safety and oncological efficacy of laparoscopic re-resection of incidental gallbladder cancer have not been studied. This study aimed to compare laparoscopic with open re-resection of incidentally discovered gallbladder cancer while minimizing selection bias. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective observational cohort study of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer who underwent re-resection with curative intent at four centres between 2000 and 2017. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analysed by intention to treat. Inverse probability of surgery treatment weighting using propensity scoring was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 255 patients underwent re-resection (190 open, 65 laparoscopic). Nineteen laparoscopic procedures were converted to open operation. Surgery before 2011 was the only factor associated with conversion. Duration of hospital stay was shorter after laparoscopic re-resection (median 4 versus 6 days; P < 0·001). Three-year OS rates for laparoscopic and open re-resection were 87 and 62 per cent respectively (P = 0·502). Independent predictors of worse OS were residual cancer found at re-resection (hazard ratio (HR) 1·91, 95 per cent c.i. 1·17 to 3·11), blood loss of at least 500 ml (HR 1·83, 1·23 to 2·74) and at least four positive nodes (HR 3·11, 1·46 to 6·65). In competing-risks analysis, the RFS incidence was higher for laparoscopic re-resection (P = 0·038), but OS did not differ between groups. Independent predictors of worse RFS were one to three positive nodes (HR 2·16, 1·29 to 3·60), at least four positive nodes (HR 4·39, 1·96 to 9·82) and residual cancer (HR 2·42, 1·46 to 4·00). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic re-resection for selected patients with incidental gallbladder cancer is oncologically non-inferior to an open approach. Dissemination of advanced laparoscopic skills and timely referral of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer to specialized centres may allow more patients to benefit from this operation.

ANTECEDENTES: No se conoce la seguridad y la eficacia oncológica de la re-resección laparoscópica del cáncer incidental de vesícula biliar. Este estudio tiene como objetivo comparar las re-resecciones del cáncer incidental de vesícula biliar por vía laparoscópica y vía abierta, minimizando el sesgo de selección. MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohortes observacional, retrospectivo y multicéntrico de pacientes con cáncer incidental de vesícula biliar que se sometieron a una re-resección con intención curativa en 4 centros entre 2000 y 2017. Se analizó la supervivencia global (overall survival, OS) y la supervivencia libre de recidiva (recurrence free survival, RFS) según intención de tratamiento. Se calculó la probabilidad inversa de la ponderación del tratamiento quirúrgico utilizando puntuación de propensión. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 255 pacientes con re-resección (190 por vía abierta y 65 por vía laparoscópica). Se convirtieron 19 pacientes del grupo laparoscópico. El único factor relacionado con la conversión fue la realización de la cirugía antes de año 2011. La mediana de la estancia hospitalaria fue más corta tras la re-resección laparoscópica (4 versus 6 días; P < 0,001). La OS a tres años fue del 87% y del 62% (P = 0,502) para las re-resecciones laparoscópicas y abiertas, respectivamente). Los factores predictivos independientes relacionados con una peor OS fueron el hallazgo de cáncer residual en el momento de la re-resección (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR 1,91; i.c. del 95% 1,17-3,11), una pérdida hemática > 500 ml (HR 1,83; i.c. del 95% 1,23-2,74) y la presencia de ≥ 4 ganglios positivos (HR 3,11; i.c. del 95% 1,46-6,65). En el análisis de riesgo competitivo, la RFS fue mayor para la resección laparoscópica (P = 0,038), pero no hubo diferencias en la OS entre ambos grupos. Los factores predictivos independientes de peor RFS fueron la detección de 1-3 ganglios positivos (HR 2,16; i.c. del 95% 1,29-3,60), ≥ 4 ganglio positivos (HR 4,39; i.c. del 95% 1,96-9,82) y el cáncer residual (HR 2,42; i.c. de 95% 1,46-4,0). CONCLUSIÓN: En pacientes seleccionados, los resultados oncológicos de la re-resección laparoscópica de un cáncer incidental de vesícula biliar no son inferiores a los que se obtienen por vía abierta. Una mayor difusión de las técnicas laparoscópicas avanzadas y una oportuna derivación de los pacientes con cáncer de vesícula biliar incidental a centros especializados podrían permitir que un mayor número de pacientes se beneficiaran de este abordaje.

Simultaneous TAPP inguinal repair and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a case series.

BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy and inguinal hernioplasty are the most frequent surgeries in Chile and the world. Laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty, being a clean surgery, reports mesh infection rates of less than 2% and adding a simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy is controversial due to an increase in the risk of mesh infection. The aim of this paper is to report the results of simultaneous TAPP hernioplasty with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of the digestive surgery database. We identified cases in which laparoscopic inguinal TAPP repair and simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy were performed. Demographic, clinical information, hernia type and size, data from the surgery and its complications were also retrieved and analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 21 patients, 86% male and with an average age of 61 years range 46-84. 72% of the hernias were unilateral, predominating indirect 50%, direct 28% and the remaining were femoral and mixed. The average hernia size was 2.2 cm. The meshes used were 56% polypropylene, 37% polyester and 5% PVDF. We report one gallblader perforation. At a median time of 40 months of follow-up (range 4-89 months), one hernia recurrence was found (3.7%), there were no reoperations at the time of the interview and there were no cases of mesh infection. Complications of surgery includes one ipsilateral testicular atrophy 4.8% and 1 ipsilateral inguinal seroma 4.8%. CONCLUSIONS: In this series of cases, adding clean contaminated surgery to the inguinal TAPP hernioplasty was not associated with an increase in the infection of the mesh.

Sublingual tacrolimus administration provides similar drug exposure to per-oral route employing lower doses in liver transplantation: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Per-oral tacrolimus administration is not always practicable. Sublingual administration is a potential alternative, but its feasibility and effectiveness compared with oral route has not been established. AIM: To compare tacrolimus drug exposure after sublingual and oral administration in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Experimental, open-label, non-randomised, cross-over study. Tacrolimus exposure was evaluated in 32 liver transplant recipients receiving oral administration. 12 h tacrolimus area-under-the-curve (AUC0-12 h ) was calculated using tacrolimus blood concentrations at 0-0.5-1-2-4-6-8-12 hrs post-dose. Recipients were switched to sublingual administration, and dose was adjusted to reach similar trough levels, new AUC0-12 h was calculated. Correlation between AUC0-12 h and trough levels was determined for both oral and sublingual phases. RESULTS: Similar trough levels were accomplished with oral and sublingual administration (6.68 ± 2 ng/mL vs. 6.62 ± 1.9 ng/mL (P = 0.8)). Although concentration 2 h post dose was higher in oral phase (15.36 ± 7.14 vs. 13.18 ± 5.64, P = 0.015), AUC0-12 h was similar in both phases (116.6 ± 34.6 vs. 111.5 ± 36.93 ng/mL* h, P = 0.19). Daily dose of tacrolimus required in sublingual phase was 37% lower than that used in oral phase (P < 0.0001), suggesting significantly increased bioavailability of tacrolimus when employing sublingual route. Good correlation between AUC0-12 h and trough levels was observed in sublingual phase (r2 = 0.74). Twenty-two recipients were maintained on sublingual administration after the end of study (mean follow-up: 18.7 ± 5.8 months). No difference in liver function tests or rejection rates was found during follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Sublingual administration of tacrolimus is feasible and provides similar drug exposure compared with oral administration. In our study, at long-term follow-up, sublingual administration was not associated with liver transplant rejection.

Liver transplantation results for hepatocellular carcinoma in Chile.

UNLABELLED: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common malignant tumor of the liver. Liver transplantation is the best treatment for HCC; it improves survival, cures cirrhosis, and abolishes local recurrence. We describe the outcomes of patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation in two liver transplantation centers in Chile. METHODS: This study is a clinical series elaborated from the liver transplantation database of Pontificia Universidad Católica and Clínica Alemana between 1993 and 2009. The survival of patients was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The significant alpha level was defined as <.05. RESULTS: From 250 liver transplantations performed in this period, 29 were due to HCC. At the end of the study, 25 patients (86%) were alive. The mean recurrence-free survival was 30 months (range 5 months to 8 years). The 5-year survival for patients transplanted for HCC was >80%; however, the 5-year overall survival of patients who exceeded the Milan criteria in the explants was 66%. There was no difference in overall survival between patients transplanted for HCC versus other diagnosis (P = .548). CONCLUSION: This series confirmed that liver transplantation is a good treatment for patients with HCC within the Milan criteria.

Bridge therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation: the experience of two Chilean centers.

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is currently an established therapy for small, early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria. Long waiting times due to the shortage of donor organs can result in tumor progression and drop-out from OLT candidacy. Therefore a wide variety of procedures are necessary before OLT. The aim of this retrospective study was to review our experience in relation to bridge therapy prior to OLT for HCC. METHODS: This was a retrospective database review of all of the patient who underwent transplantation in our institutions between January 1993 and June 2009. We analyzed patients with a diagnosis of HCC in the explant. RESULTS: Among 29 patients, including 12 who were diagnosed by the explant and 17 prior to transplantation, 88% underwent bridge therapy during a mean waiting time to OLT of 12 months. Among the 23 procedures, namely 1.5 procedures per patient, included most frequently chemoembolization (48%), alcohol ablation (30%), radiofrequency ablation (13%), and surgery (9%). Thirty-three percent of the explants contained lesions within the Milan criteria. In our series the 5-year survival rate for patients transplanted for HCC was 86%; in the bridge therapy group, it was 73%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of patients who underwent bridge therapy (52%) was similar to other reported experiences, but the fulfillment of Milan criteria in the explants was lower. Among the bridge therapy group, the survival was slightly lower, probably because this group displayed more advanced disease.

Hepatic resection after liver transplantation as a graft-saving procedure.

Biliary lesions and hepatic artery thrombosis are known causes of posttransplant liver failure and liver retransplantation. The shortage of organs and the results of retransplantation have forced transplant teams to developed graft-saving techniques. We report two cases who underwent hepatic resection after liver transplantation. In both cases, a left lateral segmentectomy was performed. At follow-up, the patients are well with optimal graft function. We believe this kind of resection represents an adequate alternative in selected cases and must be considered before enlistment for retransplantation.

Neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas: predictors of survival after surgical treatment.

AIMS: Neuroendocrine tumours of pancreatic and duodenal origin (NETP) are rare and we present a significant experience from a single centre. METHODS: Data was collected on 44 patients who underwent surgery between 1988 and 2002. Since 1997, data have been recorded prospectively on a dedicated database. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients had functioning tumours (16 insulinomas, 3 gastrinomas, 2 somatostatinomas, 1 vipoma, 1 glucagonoma and 1 carcinoid tumour). Nine functioning tumours and 13 non-functioning had a malignant phenotype. Twenty pancreaticoduodenectomies, 9 local excisions, 7 distal and 2 total pancreatectomies, 5 bypasses and 1 exploratory laparotomy were performed. Fourteen patients (31.8%) had surgical complications, 1 died peri-operatively (2.3%). The overall actuarial survival for resected cases was 74.4 and 42.5% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Lymph node invasion and metastases were significant predictors of survival by univariate analysis and only the presence of metastases retained significance on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for NETP. Resection can be safely carried out in a specialist centre and is associated with good long-term survival. The presence of metastases was a significant predictive factor for survival in patients with NEPT in this series.

Surgical treatment of metastases to the pancreas.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Metastases to the pancreas are rare and their surgical treatment is not well reported. We present a considerable experience from a single centre analysing various prognostic factors. METHODS: Data were collected on 13 cases who underwent surgery between 1988 and 2002. Since 1997, data have been recorded prospectively on a dedicated database. Clinical and histopathological factors were reviewed. RESULTS: There were two women and 11 men with a median age of 62 years (range 40-73). There were seven cases of renal cell carcinomas, three colorectal carcinomas, two sarcomas and one lung carcinoma. A prolonged disease-free interval from primary surgery was characteristic for renal cell carcinoma cases (median = 10.8 years). The operative procedures performed included seven pancreatoduodenectomies, four total and two distal pancreatectomies. The operative mortality and morbidity was 7.7% and 46.1% respectively. The overall one- and two-year survival was 78.8% and 54% respectively. Median survival for renal cell carcinoma was 30.5 months and for non-renal cell carcinoma was 26.4 months (p = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatectomy should be considered for metastases to the pancreas in the absence of generalised metastatic disease. However, decision making and experience should be concentrated in centres with significant familiarity of this approach.

Favourable prognostic factors in a large UK experience of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas and periampullary region.

AIMS: To present the surgical experience in a regional unit, analysing the post-operative outcome, and determining risk factors for survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary and pancreatic head carcinoma. METHODS: Data were collected on 251 patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma (133), ampullary carcinomas (88) and distal common bile duct (30), between 1987 and 2002. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Clinical, surgical and histopathological records were examined by univariate and multivariate analysis to identify the independent prognostic predictors of survival. RESULTS: Median actuarial survival for carcinoma of the pancreatic head, ampulla and distal bile duct were 13.4, 35.5 and 16 months, respectively; p < 0.0001. On univariate analysis for the whole series, the age < or =60, tumour of the head of the pancreas, lymph node positive, resection margin R1, poorly differentiated tumours, and portal vein invasion significantly decreased survival. On multivariate analysis, poor tumour differentiation, surgical margin, lymph node metastases, and age independently influence survival. Mortality and morbidity were 4.8 and 29.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumours is the only therapy that may cure patients and can be performed safely in centres with significant experience.